Monday, March 12, 2012

Moving towards extremism

Many people reading the title of this posting will automatically assume that I am speaking of the Occupy Movement or the policies of President Obama or some other current news headline that they believe shows some form of an extremist ideology growing in America. Actually no. I am not really talking about any particular current, hot button, issue, although I will probably mention a few before the end of this post. No, I am talking about our nation's history and a disturbing trend that has been happening slowly enough that many don't notice it but that none the less exists.

Let me start off with a couple of quotes;

Quote number 1: Should any political party attempt to abolish social security, unemployment insurance, and eliminate labor laws and farm programs, you would not hear of that party again in our political history. There is a tiny splinter group, of course, that believes you can do these things. Among them are H. L. Hunt (you possibly know his background), a few other Texas oil millionaires, and an occasional politician or business man from other areas. Their number is negligible and they are stupid.

Quote number 2: Recognizing the equality of all men and women, we are willing and able to lift the weak, cradle those who hurt, and nurture the bonds that tie us together as one nation under God.

I didn't attribute the above quotes to anyone because I want you to think about who might have said them. Quote number one speaks to the popularity and importance of the largest social programs in our country, or as conservatives would call them "entitlements". Many conservative leaders in our nation would be thrilled to do away with social security, unemployment insurance, labor laws and farm programs as they see them as a drain on our economy, unnecessary government expenditures, and programs that encourage laziness by providing a way for people to avoid working for a living. Several leading conservatives had proposed plans that, even if they didn't eliminate these programs outright, would restructure these programs in such a way as to cause their death over time. So who is this person who claims that ending these programs would be political suicide and outright "stupid"? Obviously it must be an extremist liberal who can't relate to the real world from his or her academic ivory tower. I won't keep you guessing, the extremist liberal who said quote number one was Republican President of the United States, Dwight Eisenhower.

Quote number two is obviously from some touchy feely liberal. A lefty concerned with nothing but amorphous issues like "equality" and taking care of the poor so they don't have to take care of themselves. This is exactly the type of person that conservatives enjoy painting President Obama as. Lifting the weak and cradling those who hurt, I wonder how much that will raise our taxes? These people need to go out and get jobs so we don't have to lift or cradle them. Of course these kinds of ideas come from thinking that everyone is equal, Donald Trump and a homeless drunk are not equal. Liberals want us to think they are so that they can take Mr. Trump's money and give it to a bum who doesn't deserve it. It is easy to see that quote number 2 had to come from the leader of some fringe socialist group. In fact this socialist leader was President Ronald Reagan and he said this while accepting the GOP presidential nomination for his second term at the Republican National Convention in 1984.

Of course a single quote can fail to really show you the nature of a person. So let's take a look at the policies of Eisenhower, and Reagan.

Eisenhower, as you can see from quote number one, was a believer in social programs like social security and unemployment insurance. He also didn't seem to think that lowering taxes was a huge issue as the earners in the top income tax bracket paid no less than 75% during his two terms. He also didn't mind big government spending projects (of course he had the tax revenue coming into pay for them) like the interstate road system that he started and funded. He could also see the danger of letting the concerns of the business world take precedence over the concerns of the real world as he warned the nation in his farewell address. In this speech he spoke of the dangers of the US "military-industrial complex" that would harm our nation to promote their own selfish goals. President Eisenhower today would not be seen as a conservative, in fact he would probably be seen as being to the left of President Obama. This begs the question, what happened?

Ronald Reagan is the patron saint of today's conservative movement. As we have seen in quote number two, however, Reagan may not have been as conservative as many today would like to believe. Yes, Reagan spoke often of smaller government and lowering taxes. In action though Reagan did not always live up to the goals he set for himself. This is because Reagan could step away from the ideology from time to time and address reality. When his 1981 tax cuts were shown to be creating a budget shortfall of huge proportions Reagan quickly backtracked and raised taxes to prevent the budget deficit from climbing to levels not seen since World War II. In fact Reagan signed off on tax increases about a dozen times during his two terms. Why would the hero of Congressional members who have signed pledges to never raise taxes for any reason do something like this? Because he saw that it was the best thing for our country. Pragmatism won out over ideology. Of course it wasn't just in tax policy that Reagan veered off of the road to today's vision of conservatism. Reagan grew the size of the government in terms of man power and new regulations on individuals and businesses. Reagan dramatically increased spending even in departments like the Department of Energy which he had vowed to eliminate. Reagan extended our military reach into the rest of the world. Reagan, the hero of today's conservative, was in fact a big government, tax and spend President who put our country deeper into debt than it had ever been before. If he is the founder of the conservative movement we see today we must ask ourselves, what happened?

Of course it isn't just Reagan and Eisenhower, Nixon was a major proponent of expensive social programs, Barry Goldwater supported gay rights, and the list goes on and on. Conservatives today are, when compared to the conservatives of just a few years ago, radical extremists who have moved so far to the right in their actions and propaganda as to have turned the Republican Party into something that would be unrecognizable to Lincoln or Eisenhower or even Reagan.

Recently Rachel Maddow aired a segment looking at the work of a political scientist at the University of Georgia. Often times it is said that people on the right are moving further to the right and people on the left are moving further to the left. This is the easiest way to explain the political divide we find ourselves in today, but it simply isn't true. In fact Congressional Democrats have been inching towards the right, not the left, the divide comes from the fact that Congressional Republicans have been running full speed ahead toward the right creating the divide completely on their own.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy


If current trends continue we will be seeing more discussions of banning contraceptives and passing laws to encourage discrimination against gays and lesbians. We will see a continuing economic divide exacerbated by the weakening or elimination of the social safety net. We will see growing poverty while those at the top, those who I feel are responsible for pushing our nation so far towards the radical right, see their incomes continue to climb while their tax rates drop. We are seeing the takeover of our nation by a wealthy class who is using propaganda and class warfare to turn our nation into a banana republic where the rich prosper and the poor will work for anything and in any condition just to keep from starving. The leaders of the right are using social issues and economic lies to coerce us into accepting them as our rulers so that they can rig the system to work for them, and only them. They are a threat to our freedom and our democracy as they try to restrict voters rights and limit political speech to only those with pockets deep enough to drown out everyone who disagrees with them. I do not want to see the right go away, we need their ideas in the competitive marketplace that is US politics, but at the moment they seem, especially in many states, to be trying to form political monopolies and we must work to stop this.

I will freely admit to having many problems with some of Reagan's policies and tactics, but I wish we could return to the days when his actions actually represented the conservative movement and the Republican Party. Today Reagan is simply the most revered god in the right's pantheon of deities and they are making up the mythology about him, and themselves, as they go along.

Saturday, March 3, 2012

Words for liberals

In 1994 Newt Gingrich wrote a memo that was distributed to Republican politicians through an organization called GOPAC. This memo was titled "Language: A Key Mechanism of Control" and contained a list of "Contrasting Words" and "Optimistic Positive Governing Words" which Gingrich suggested that Republican candidates use to frame their campaign and their opponents. As I read through these lists today I realized just how appropriately these lists could be used today, not by conservatives, but by liberals. So I am republishing these lists of words and phrases, with a few minor changes, and suggesting that any liberal candidates out there start incorporating these words into their campaigns. It is time for Gingrich's Republican revolution to end.

Contrasting Words

Often we search hard for words to help us define our opponents. Sometimes we are hesitant to use contrast. Remember that creating a difference helps you. These are powerful words that can create a clear and easily understood contrast. Apply these to the opponent, their record, proposals and their party.

decay... failure (fail)... collapse(ing)... deeper... crisis... urgent(cy)... destructive... destroy... sick... pathetic... lie... liberal conservative... they/them... unionized self serving bureaucracy... "compassion" is not enough... betray... consequences... limit(s)... shallow... traitors... sensationalists...

endanger... coercion... hypocrisy... radical... threaten... devour... waste... corruption... incompetent... permissive attitudes... destructive... impose... self-serving... greed... ideological... insecure... anti-(issue): flag middle class family, child, jobs... pessimistic... excuses... intolerant...

stagnation... welfare... corrupt... selfish... insensitive... status quo... mandate(s)... taxes... spend(ing)... shame... disgrace... punish (poor...)... bizarre... cynicism... cheat... steal... abuse of power... machine... bosses... obsolete... criminal rights wealthy rights... red tape... patronage

Optimistic Positive Governing Words

Use the list below to help define your campaign and your vision of public service. These words can help give extra power to your message. In addition, these words help develop the positive side of the contrast you should create with your opponent, giving your community something to vote for!

share... change... opportunity... legacy... challenge... control... truth... moral... courage... reform... prosperity... crusade... movement... children... family... debate... compete... active(ly)... we/us/our... candid(ly)... humane... pristine... provide...

liberty... commitment... principle(d)... unique... duty... precious... premise... care(ing)... tough... listen... learn... help... lead... vision... success... empower(ment)... citizen... activist... mobilize... conflict... light... dream... freedom...

peace... rights... pioneer... proud/pride... building... preserve... pro-(issue): flag, children, environment... reform... workfare corporate workfare... eliminate good-time in prison citizenship by proxy... strength... choice/choose... fair... protect... confident... incentive... hard work... initiative... common sense... passionate

Liberals don't need to turn these words against conservatives, we need to show that conservatives have turned against these words. Liberals can use these words more effectively against conservatives than conservatives could ever have used them against liberals. When liberals use these words there is truth behind them, sooner or later truth will win, lets make it sooner rather than later.

Thursday, March 1, 2012

Liberal vs. conservative governments, which one actually works better?

In this years Republican primaries many have been surprised by Mitt Romney's failure to connect with Republican voters. Many reasons have been proposed to explain this disconnect, but my favorite is that Mitt Romney, the former governor Massachusetts, is too moderate to appeal to conservatives. After all, how could a real conservative ever have been elected governor of a bastion of liberal ideology like the state of Massachusetts? There is probably a lot of truth in this concept and it would might have been better for Romney if he had been the governor of a very conservative state like my home state, Tennessee.

Tennessee versus Massachusetts, a Southern state and a Northern state. A conservative state and a liberal state. It is pretty easy to see why many conservatives would prefer a candidate from a state like Tennessee to a state like Massachusetts, but in making this comparison we are faced with a question. Which state's government does a better job? Conservatives are practical people who are interested in results, so does Tennessee perform better than a state with high taxes, legally recognized gay marriage, and a health care system which was the basis for President Obama's health care reforms like Massachusetts? Let's take a look and see.

Social conservatives will point to same sex marriage as evidence that liberals do not support traditional family values and do not value the traditional family structure. So why then do only 31% of children in Massachusetts live in single family homes when 37% of children live in single family homes in Tennessee? Why does Tennessee have the 8th highest divorce rate in the US while Massachusetts has the lowest divorce rate in the country? Obviously the traditional family is doing better in a liberal state that supports gay marriage than it is in a state that has tried to make it illegal to even say the word gay in public schools.

Massachusetts - 1, Tennessee - 0

What about education? There are very few issues that rank higher for most voters and conservatives have strong beliefs about this issue. Here in Tennessee the government has put limitations on what can and can't be taught in public schools. The government has stripped teachers of their collective bargaining rights, and looked at increasing class sizes while reducing teacher pay. Surely this has produced a more efficient, better performing public education system? Well no. According to Education Week Magazine in their annual ranking of public school systems Massachusetts has the 3rd best performing public schools in the nation. Tennessee? This shining example of conservatism ranks 23rd.

Massachusetts - 2, Tennessee - 0

Surely though, Tennessee must have a system that encourages hard work and personal responsibility to a greater extent than the cradle to grave, oppressive, socialist strong hold of Massachusetts. If so then why are 19.9% of Tennesseans on food stamps while only 12.2% of Massachusettsians receiving this form of government assistance? Why are only 10.1% of the people in Massachusetts living in poverty while 15% of Tennesseans find themselves in poverty? Could this relate to the fact that the unemployment rate in Massachusetts is only 6.9% while it is 8.5% in Tennessee? Could it be that, even with a strong social safety net and a high tax rate, that people in Massachusetts still want to work hard and succeed? Conservatives will say tell you that a high tax rate will keep people from wanting to work hard and that social programs will give them an excuse not to, but Massachusetts has the 5th largest number of millionaires per capita in the nation while Tennessee ranks 44th.

Massachusetts - 3, Tennessee - 0

When all of this evidence is out there and easy to find why is that so many people still believe that conservative policies will succeed and liberal policies will fail? Simple, conservative policies do work, but only for a small group of people. That small group of people also tends to be the group of people who set government policy and the political tone for our country. They are amazingly intelligent people who have managed to whitewash the facts and pull the wool over the eyes of many Americans. Their success does not equate to your success and your pain and inability to live the American dream isn't one of their concerns.

Think about it for a minute, do you want live in a state with rampant poverty, where fewer people achieve financial success, where a single accident or illness can lead to your economic destruction, where children seem to be considered an annoyance instead of the hope for our future? If so then Tennessee is the place for you. Sure the taxes in Tennessee are lower than in Massachusetts, but that just means it is harder for the state to do what it should to make it possible for as many people to succeed as possible. Is Tennessee a shining example of conservative values or is it a stain on the American dream? Maybe it is time to get out the detergent so that we can clean the dirty greed out of Tennessee. The numbers don't lie, so we shouldn't lie to ourselves. Conservatism is a failed ideology that is bad for our country, let's reject radical conservatism and embrace the success that can come from hard work when we allow success to be an option for everyone instead of just a few.